The Real Anthony Fauci is a 2021 book written by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in which he attacks Anthony Fauci and his leadership of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. In the book, Kennedy promotes HIV/AIDS denialism and misinformation about Fauci’s role during the HIV epidemic and the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.
The book accuses American public health leader Anthony Fauci of 30 years of abuse of power, during both the HIV epidemic and the COVID-19 pandemic.
In the book, Kennedy accuses Fauci of pulling off “a historic coup d’état against Western democracy” and promotes unproven COVID-19 treatments, including hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. The author shares his opinion that COVID-19 vaccines are not sufficiently safety tested and likens vaccine mandates in the United States to living under the rule of Nazi Germany.
To get some historical perspective on Anthony Fauci’s thinking on conducting ‘Gain of Function’ research, can be found within a paper he wrote back on October 9 2012, where Anthony Fauci argued the benefits of gain-of-function research was worth the risk of a laboratory accident sparking a pandemic.
However, the issue that has been intensely debated is whether knowledge obtained from these experiments could inadvertently affect public health in an adverse way, even in nations multiple time zones away.
consider this hypothetical scenario: an important gain-of-function experiment involving a virus with serious pandemic potential is performed in a well-regulated, worldclass laboratory by experienced investigators, but the information from the experiment is then used by another scientist who does not have the same training and facilities and is not subject to the same regulations. In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?
Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario—however remote—should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?
Scientists working in this field might say—as indeed I have said—that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks. It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky.
However, we must respect that there are genuine and legitimate concerns about this type of research, both domestically and globally. We cannot expect those who have these concerns to simply take us, the scientific community, at our word that the benefits of this work outweigh the risks, nor can we ignore their calls for greater transparency, their concerns about conflicts of interest, and their efforts to engage in a dialog about whether these experiments should have been performed in the first place.
Anthony Fauci
The full paper can be read » here (opens in a new window).
Should that link be deleted, you can view a pdf of the article » here.
The following videos, many from US Senate investigations conclusively prove a coverup using misinformation and disinformation on an unprecedented ‘novel’ scale.
What was called conspiracy theory by governments and medical practitioners, has now been proved FACT.
In some of the following videos, you will hear the term ‘Gain of Function‘ and the term ‘ePPP‘ (‘Enhanced Potential Pandemic Pathogens‘). So by way of trying to explain what they mean…
ePPP (Enhanced Potential Pandemic Pathogens):
Refers to pathogens that have been intentionally modified to enhance their transmissibility or virulence in humans. Research involving ePPPs is highly regulated due to the potential risks of creating more dangerous pathogens1. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) oversees such research through the P3CO framework to ensure strict biosafety and biosecurity measures.
Gain of Function (GoF)
This is a broader term that describes experiments that involve altering a pathogen to enhance its properties, such as virulence or transmissibility. While GoF research can include ePPP research, not all GoF research involves ePPPs. GoF research aims to understand how pathogens might evolve naturally and to develop countermeasures, but it can be controversial due to the potential risks involved.
In summary, ePPP is a specific subset of gain of function research that involves enhancing pathogens to study their pandemic potential, and it is subject to additional oversight and strict safety measures.
Fauci LIES On Gain Of Function Research CONFIRMED By NIH, EcoHealth Failed To Report Findings
(Posted: Oct 22 2021, 13:46 minutes)
Rand Paul Catches Fauci in a Lie, Leaves Him Stuttering
(Posted: Nov 5 2021, 9:02 minutes)
You Can Deny It All You Want’: Rand Paul Rips Fauci Over Gain-Of-Function Research
(Posted: Nov 7 2021, 6:28 minutes)
Heated Exchange between Sen. Rand Paul & Dr. Anthony Fauci on Vaccines and Royalties
(Posted: Jun 17 2022, 7:37 minutes)
Rand Paul Directly Confronts Antony Blinken About COVID-19 Research Funding Records
(Posted: Mar 23 2023, 8:23 minutes)
CDC, Fauci IGNORED Test That DEMOLISHED Asymptomatic Covid Spread STORY IN SPRING 2020
(Posted: May 11 2023, 13:34 minutes)
Scientists at Stanford University produced a test in May of 2020, the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic and found that 96 percent of people who were PCR positive but without symptoms were not infectious.
This test could have changed the course of the pandemic response by avoiding the need for restrictions but was never rolled out.
The paper from researchers at Stanford University School of Medicine and Stanford Hospitals, showed transmission from asymptomatic people was far, far less common than we were led to believe.
The CDC published the paper on its website on February 2021.
Strand-Specific Reverse Transcription PCR for Detection of Replicating SARS-CoV-2
If that link has been removed, a pdf can be viewed here:
Strand-Specific Reverse Transcription PCR for Detection of Replicating SARS-CoV-2
Fauci’s LAB LEAK COVER-UP Confirmed, There MUST Be Consequences
(Posted: Jun 23 2023, 11:46 minutes)
Covid Lab Leak EVIDENCE in US Gov Hands (Proximal Origins Hearing)
(Posted: Jul 13 2023, 13:03 minutes)
Anthony Fauci GRILLED By Congress On LAB LEAK, Vaccines, Masking Rules
(Posted: Jun 4 2024, 11:38 minutes)
Rand Paul Reads Out Secret Communications Of Fauci’s Team About COVID-19’s Origins
(Posted: Jun 19 2024, 5:14 minutes)
‘Is This In Fact A Bioweapon?’ Roger Marshall Grills Doctor About COVID-19 Origins
(Posted: Jun 19 2024, 8:82 minutes)
COVID-19 Lab-Leak Theory ‘Cover-Up’ Probed (Senate Homeland Security Committee)
(Posted: Jun 19 2024, 2:14:52 hours)
Despite the amount of lies uncovered, the Australian government and media, are still peddling the narrative of wearing masks, taking booster shots of the ‘vaccine’ and hiding the side-effects of vaccines.
It should be noted both Labor and Liberal governments have ‘classified’ the information given to them from pharmaceutical companies, in the ‘National interest’.
Leave a Reply